- 14-Jun-2025
- Elder & Estate Planning law
The Group of Companies doctrine allows non-signatory companies within a corporate group to be bound by or enforce an arbitration agreement entered into by one company in the group. This doctrine prevents parties from evading arbitration by merely structuring related transactions through different legal entities within the same corporate group.
The doctrine treats a group of companies as a single economic entity for the purposes of arbitration agreements.
It allows the extension of arbitration clauses signed by one company to other companies in the group, especially when the dispute arises from transactions related to the group as a whole.
While the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not explicitly mention the doctrine, Indian courts have recognized it based on principles of agency, estoppel, and implied consent.
The Supreme Court in Ameet Lalchand Shah v. Rishabh Enterprises (2013) acknowledged the doctrine’s applicability in appropriate cases.
The doctrine helps prevent misuse of corporate structures to avoid arbitration.
Company A signs a contract with an arbitration clause. Company B and Company C, part of the same corporate group but non-signatories, are involved in related business transactions and disputes arise.
The tribunal or courts may apply the group of companies doctrine to bind Companies B and C to arbitration despite their non-signatory status, if they are sufficiently connected to the contract and dispute.
The Group of Companies doctrine ensures that related companies within a corporate group cannot escape arbitration by relying on their non-signatory status, promoting fairness and preventing misuse of corporate form.
Answer By Law4u TeamDiscover clear and detailed answers to common questions about public international law. Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.