- 19-May-2025
- Transportation and Traffic Laws
Where any such case is heard before a Bench of Judges and such Judges are equally divided in opinion, the case shall be decided in the manner provided by section 433.
Section 411 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, outlines the procedure to be followed when Judges are equally divided in their opinion while hearing a case before a Bench of Judges. In such cases, the decision will be made in accordance with the process laid out in Section 433 of the same Act.
A1: If the Judges are equally divided in opinion, the case will be decided in the manner provided by Section 433 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
A2: Section 433 comes into play when there is a difference of opinion among Judges in a case heard by a Bench.
A3: No, Section 411 does not specify an alternative method; it directs that the case be decided following the procedure described in Section 433.
A case is being heard by a Bench of two Judges, and they are unable to agree on the judgment. According to Section 411, since they are divided in opinion, the case will be decided as per the procedure outlined in Section 433.
In a three-judge Bench, two Judges are in favor of a particular decision, but the third Judge disagrees. Since there is an equal division, Section 411 would require the case to be resolved under Section 433, which may involve further procedural steps.
Section 411 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, addresses the scenario where Judges on a Bench are equally divided in their opinion. In such cases, the case is to be decided as per the procedure provided in Section 433, ensuring that the matter is resolved in a systematic manner.
Answer By Law4u Team
Discover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.
