- 19-May-2025
- Transportation and Traffic Laws
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Sanhita or in any other law for the time being in force, when a person declared as a proclaimed offender, whether or not charged jointly, has absconded to evade trial and there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, it shall be deemed to operate as a waiver of the right of such person to be present and tried in person, and the Court shall, after recording reasons in writing, in the interest of justice, proceed with the trial in the like manner and with like effect as if he was present, under this Sanhita and pronounce the judgment:
(2) The Court shall ensure that the following procedure has been complied with before proceeding under sub-section (1) namely:—
(3) Where the proclaimed offender is not represented by any advocate, he shall be provided with an advocate for his defence at the expense of the State.
(4) Where the Court, competent to try the case or commit for trial, has examined any witnesses for prosecution and recorded their depositions, such depositions shall be given in evidence against such proclaimed offender on the inquiry into, or in trial for, the offence with which he is charged:
(5) Where a trial is related to a person under this section, the deposition and examination of the witness may, as far as practicable, be recorded by audio-video electronic means preferably mobile phone and such recording shall be kept in such manner as the Court may direct.
(6) In prosecution for offences under this Sanhita, voluntary absence of accused after the trial has commenced under sub-section (1) shall not prevent continuing the trial including the pronouncement of the judgment even if he is arrested and produced or appears at the conclusion of such trial.
(7) No appeal shall lie against the judgment under this section unless the proclaimed offender presents himself before the Court of appeal:
(8) The State may, by notification, extend the provisions of this section to any absconder mentioned in sub-section (1) of section 84 of this Sanhita.
Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 outlines the procedures for conducting inquiries and trials in the absence of proclaimed offenders. It allows the Court to proceed with trials without the offender's presence if certain conditions are met, including the issuance of warrants and public notification. The section also ensures the accused is provided with legal representation and allows for evidence to be recorded electronically. Appeals against judgments can only be made if the offender presents themselves to the Court.
A: It is deemed a waiver of the right to be present for trial, allowing the Court to proceed with the trial in their absence.
A: The Court cannot commence the trial until at least ninety days have passed from the date of framing the charge.
A: The Court must issue two consecutive warrants, publish notifications in a newspaper, inform relatives, and display information at the accused's residence and local police station.
A: The State will provide an advocate for their defense at no cost.
A: Yes, if they are arrested and appear during the trial, the Court may allow them to examine evidence taken in their absence.
A: Yes, no appeal can be made unless the proclaimed offender presents themselves before the Court, and appeals against conviction cannot be made after three years from the judgment date.
Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides a framework for conducting trials in the absence of proclaimed offenders. It establishes clear procedures for notification and representation, ensures that trials can proceed without the accused's presence under specific conditions, and outlines the rights of the accused regarding appeals and evidence examination.
Answer By Law4u TeamDiscover clear and detailed answers to common questions about Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS). Learn about procedures and more in straightforward language.