Article 141 of the Indian Constitution states that the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India. Meaning: When the Supreme Court delivers a judgment interpreting the Constitution or any law, that interpretation becomes the authoritative legal principle. This principle or rule laid down by the Supreme Court must be followed by all other courts in India (High Courts, lower courts). It ensures uniformity and consistency in the application of law across the country. No other court can disregard or contradict the Supreme Court’s legal rulings on the same issue. This principle is called “binding precedent” or “stare decisis.” Practical Effect: If the Supreme Court interprets a statute or constitutional provision, all courts must apply that interpretation in future cases. Lower courts must follow the Supreme Court’s decisions even if they disagree. Only the Supreme Court itself or the legislature can change that law. Summary: Article 141 makes the Supreme Court’s legal decisions final and binding on all courts in India, ensuring a unified and consistent legal system.

Dear Client, Article 141 of the Indian Constitution provides that the law announced by the Supreme Court is binding on all the courts within the jurisdiction of India. This gives the Supreme Court the final word as the interpreter of the law and the Constitution.Law declared is used to mean the legal rules and meanings established by the Supreme Court in passing judgments.These guidelines become binding precedents which all lower courts throughout the nation, from High Courts to District Courts to tribunals, have to adhere to. The logic behind Article 141 is to have uniformity and consistency in interpretation and application of law across India. When the Supreme Court resolves a legal question, its interpretation is authoritative, and all lower courts are obligated to implement it in similar matters.This provides stability to the judicial system and avoids conflicting judgments by various courts. It should be mentioned, though, that only the ratio decidendi, or the legal principle or reasoning that is absolutely vital to the decision, binds under Article 141.The obiter dicta, or statements issued by the Court that are not pivotal to the decision, carry no binding force but possess persuasive force. Further, the Supreme Court itself is not bound by its previous decisions and is free to overrule them if need arises. I hope this answer helps. In case of future queries, please feel free to contact us. Thank you.